Recently we installed MS Dynamic SL with Service Pack 4. We just set up the GL, CoA and SubAccount. And We generated CoA/Sub-account combinations too. We could clearly view the combinations in the maintenance Tab. Our issue: In the 'Journal Transaction' Entry, We could see the Account/Subaccount Combinations when we press F3, but it(Both Account & Sub-Account) is not coming into the Transaction worksheet if we give 'Enter'. Kindly help!
↧
Forum Post: CoA/Subaccount Combinations related in Data Entry.
↧
Forum Post: Sub-Account Segments
In my MS Dynamic, there are 3 segments in Sub-accounts. As of Now I can only enter each segment individually by pressing F3 key 3 times to get the whole Sub-Account in that Cell. Is there a way to enter the Whole Sub-Account in one Click or just a F3 press...? Pls help to fix this issue.
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: Sub-Account Segments
Hi, you should go to the Flexikey Definition, which can be located in Shared Information; call up the window; choose subaccount and make sure that the option "valid combo required" is checked. If it is not, you need to chose that option and save it. However, you need to be in initialize mode to save the information.
↧
Forum Post: Add new calculated field in grid
Hi, Currently trying to add a calculated field in the detail grid of Sales Orders (40.100.00). I figured how to do it if I use a user field in the table SOLine but, I don't want to save this calculation in the database. I managed to make it work to if I'm in form view but, you can only see one row. Is there a way to have a field that will appear in a grid and that will not be linked to the database? Hopefully someone will be able to help me, thanks.
↧
Forum Post: RE: Running "Post Transactions" in General Ledger and it appears to be hung up - Can we abort the process?
Most processes under Dynamics SL recover nicely if you abort the process so you should be able to abort this process. To see if the post transactions totally completed or not after an abort, open the screen again to see if any batches show in the grid. If not, the process likely completed. If batches show, run the process again. Part of the task performed is to update the accthist table during the post process. As an extra measure, you could run the detail general ledger and look for any account/sub-account combinations where the ending balance has an asterisk. If an account does, that means that the accthist ending balance does not match the beginning balance plus the net effect of the shown debit and credits. If you have that issue then the post transactions did not properly handle the abort and further action will be needed.
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: Accidentally released a payables batch and can't delete it!
Once an AP batch is released you cannot fully delete it. It is possible to delete an un-posted batch using initialize mode and the GL journal transaction screen but that only deletes the GL side and not the AP documents and transactions so you do not want to take that approach. At this point, your only solution is to create debit adjustments to offset the vouchers that were created. Then, if you want, you can do a check run for those vendors which will pick up the vouchers and the offsetting debit adjustments producing zero dollar checks so that the vouchers and the debit adjustments are then closed documents. If you do not want these zero dollar checks and the vendors have, or will have, payable vouchers, you can wait until you need to cut valid checks for these vendors and the process will pick up the bad vouchers and offsetting debit adjustments along with the valid vouchers.
↧
Forum Post: System Message 6909: Another process has already added the cursor=DefaultCreated
Hello! We're running SL 2011 and experienced a problem with releasing an AP batch. One check was printed. It's grayed out, partially released, no way to release or delete. When we try to release we get "System Message 6909: Another process has already added the cursor=DefaultCreated..." message. I ran debug script and got the following error: Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'APAdjust0'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.APAdjust'. The duplicate key value is (001563 , VO, 000357....... So looks like the process started and there is an entry in APAdjust, but something happened and it couldn't finish the process, Does anyone has any idea how to fix it? I saw similar question from 2012, but no answer or even reply. Thanks in advance. Igor
↧
Forum Post: Filtered Quick Query view not saved
Our SL2011 client using Windows security with SQL2012 is unable to save filtered Quick Query views in their test setup. Non-IT users of SL databases receive only the access given to them through SL. All rights have been assigned to these QQ views through SL. What rights should be reviewed to find why no user (including members of the SL Administrators group) can save filtered views? This client restricts access in many parts of their network setup, so there may be a rights restriction imposed outside of SL affecting their ability to update QVCatalog in the database.
↧
Forum Post: RE: Quick Query Paging/Max Rows
Thank Bruce, I changed the Paging to No in my .ini file and got the desired results. [QuickQuery] Paging=No MaxSQLRows=10000
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: Running "Post Transactions" in General Ledger and it appears to be hung up - Can we abort the process?
This answered our questions. Thank you for your assistance.
↧
Forum Post: RE: Moving SL7 FP1 to new 2012 server with SQL 2012.
Thanks for the information. I have found out since that the client. (Due to support with SL7 being ended soon) Are looking at upgrading to 2015. Any issues that you found and does the interface require retraining for the personnel involved.
↧
Forum Post: RE: Moving SL7 FP1 to new 2012 server with SQL 2012.
Hi Alex, We are currently migrating from SL7 to SL2015 CU2. We have found that there isn't a significant training requirement. The major things are: Active applications pane is no longer available - the icons in the task bar must be used instead Changing company process is different - opening another company no longer closes the current company therefore the same form can now be open in several companies at the same time Business date is retained on change of company (ie not reset to current date as it does in SL7) Crystal reports parameters look very different PV lookups provide improved selection options There is a new option to search for a screen/report etc from the main menu - very useful for new or infrequent users Quick Query is available From a technical perspective: "Set Nocount on" must be used on all customisations and Crystal reports Crystal reports selection SQL and parameters must be in Crystal language not Transactional SQL they could in SL7 eg database fields must be enclosed in {} Less options to export from a Crystal report eg txt and ttx no longer available We have had to make changes to every Crystal report with parameters to accommodate changes to how these are managed and displayed That's all I can think of at present
↧
Forum Post: RE: Quick Query and Customization Manager
I added a button on the Sales Order screen to lookup a customer's detail lines of order history, and the button opens the related QQ_SOLine display. How can I pass the active customer ID to the Quick Query screen as a parameter? Also, how can I open a filtered view rather than the base Quick Query view?
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: Sub-Account Segments
Thanks Lisa! It works well in my older version of Solomon 4.5. I have asked our authorized person to look your suggestion in MS dynamics since I could only view it. We hope it will solve our major challenge now. Thanks again.
↧
Forum Post: RE: System Message 6909: Another process has already added the cursor=DefaultCreated
The primary key on the apadjust table consists of the adjusted reference number, the adjusted doc type, the adjusting reference number, the adjusting doc type, the vendor id, the adjusting account number and the adjusting sub-account number. So, it appears that this combination already exists in the apadjust table. That either means it existed before you released this check batch or the release of this batch had gotten far enough to make this entry and now a second attempt to release the batch is running into this entry. However, it has been my experience that SL handles the later case without error. The third possibility is that there is an issue with your check batch you are trying to release such that it has this same combination twice thereby causing the error. So, I suspect that your issue is not one of trying to re-release the batch. One way to determine that would be to run a query against the apadjust table filtering for the primary key combination and look at the adjbatnbr field for the record that is found. If that field contains the current check batch number then you will know the issue is not caused by a prior batch with the same combination of items. You can also look at the artran records for the current check batch. They provide the information that goes into apadjust. Once you determine whether the collision is from a prior batch or from the current batch we can then determine what needs to be done to correct it. One final thought. Has this database been active for a fairly long time and have you possible changed bank accounts such that you have started to recycle check numbers? If so then the possibility that the issue is resulting from a prior and older batch.
↧
Blog Post: Top 5 Reasons You Can't Miss the User-Led Content at the 2017 DSLUG Conference
The DSLUG 2017 Conference, which will be held in Tampa, FL on Sept. 12-15, is the premier user-centric conference dedicated to Dynamics SL education. Microsoft Dynamics SL users and partners will find expanded value in this year's extended session schedule . Expertise is shared openly and honestly allowing attendees to hone in on their product modules, industry, and role—providing the ultimate customized experience that offers return on investment year-round. Knowledge gained at Conference has real-life application and the potential for remarkable results. HERE ARE THE TOP 5 REASONS YOU CAN’T MISS THE USER-LED CONTENT AT THE 2017 DSLUG CONFERENCE. HINT: SHARE THESE WITH YOUR BOSS! 1. Customized Content for Your Business Needs You have questions. We bring the right people together to discuss them. The DSLUG Conference provides concentrated learning for Microsoft Dynamics SL users with 100+ peer-led sessions focused on individual modules, roles, and industry best practices, giving you a tailored learning experience that best suits your individual needs and experience level. Check out the list of 2017 sessions here . "I am thankful that I attended. I have a much better understanding of how SL and SQL interact, how to better customize the environment for my staff, and I came away with a lot of ideas on improving our SL environment's redundancy and reliability." – Sarah, Director of Information Technology 2. Best Practices from Peers Only at the DSLUG Conference does everyone speak your language and want to talk, grow, share, and build Dynamics SL knowledge together. You will network, learn and share with your SL peers including knowledgeable speakers. This is your opportunity to connect with hundreds of fellow Dynamics SL users, Microsoft personnel, and Partner Subject Matter Experts – all in one place! 3. Access to High-Quality Training Experiences Make the most of your time at Conference by taking advantage of DSLUG’s Premium Academy Sessions. These hands-on training courses feature an instructor-led classroom environment focused on content that dives deep into targeted functional areas. Check out the classes and add Premium Academy Sessions to your Conference registration before they sell out! “I've worked with Solomon/SL for almost 20 years both as an IT Director and Corporate Controller and I thought I had a very good grasp of Customizations until I attended (the Advanced Customization) class. My knowledge grew almost exponentially... I t's a MUST ATTEND for any serious Dynamics SL Programmer .” – Donald, ERP Systems Manager 4. Immediate Solutions for Dynamics SL Learn best practices and real-world scenarios from SL subject matter experts. Engage in product-enhancing conversations directly with Microsoft team members, including gaining insight into product roadmaps. Utilize a network of professionals throughout the Dynamics SL User Group (DSLUG) who can help you discover the best way to maximize the capabilities of Dynamics SL. 5. Valuable Networking with Fellow Users Network in an open and honest, authentic community-driven environment that allows you to create lasting connections with Dynamics SL peers who will help you find answers to your burning questions at Conference and at home. There is no question the DSLUG Conference provides unmatched ROI to you and your organization. The Dynamics SL and business knowledge gained at Conference has real-life application and potential for remarkable results for your career, job role, and your organization. GET THE INSIDE SCOOP! We sat down with Jennifer Pippin, DSLUG Content Chair, to talk about the user-led content you can’t miss at the DSLUG 2017 Conference. Jennifer and the members of the DSLUG Content Committee have worked diligently the last several months to establish the most relevant, useful, and exciting tracks and sessions for you at this year’s Conference. Click here for her blog to get insider tips and learn how to make the most of your Conference experience! Don’t miss the best Dynamics SL education and networking event of the year! REGISTER NOW Learn more about the DSLUG 2017 Conference by visiting www.dslugconference.com . Blog originally posted on www.dslug.com
↧
Forum Post: RE: System Message 6909: Another process has already added the cursor=DefaultCreated
Thank you for replying. the database is fairly new and we know for certain that check numbers weren't reused. Doesn't look to me there is a collision with another batch, but looks like second possibility you describe. I'm not sure what is the policy for the forum, but i could post whole output of sqldebug script. In the output i noticed this: ######################## LOOK FOR TOP ERRORS ################# Stuck records in WRKRelease or WRKReleaseBad WRKRelease BatNbr Module UserAddress tstamp (0 row(s) affected) WRKReleaseBad BatNbr Module MsgID UserAddress tstamp 001748 AP 0 CFAPPSERVER3RDP-Tcp#0 0x00000000004A7302 I'm not too sophisticated with SQL, but i found there is an entry in apajust for batch number 001747 that printed the first check. What else i can check?
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: System Message 6909: Another process has already added the cursor=DefaultCreated
If this is the case of a partially released batch trying to be released again then the batch should have a status of S. You did not indicate that in your post but I suspect that is what you have. To further diagnose the issue and come up with a solution we need to know some more information. Let's start with how many checks are in this batch. This helps determine what cautions need to be taken during the resolution. I would like to see the apadjust records that have the adjbatnbr equal to this batch and the aptran records from this batch. This tells us how many records have been added to the apadjust table for this batch and what is left to be done. Care needs to be taken because not only are apadjust records being added but the paid vouchers are being updated as well as the vendor history during the release process. Normally working this issue is best done where the "expert" has a remote connection to the database and performs the necessary steps to correct the situation as opposed to a forum post on what to do since the actions taken vary depending on what is in the database and the actual cause of the problem. Are you the end user or an SL partner trying to resolve this issue?
↧
Forum Post: RE: System Message 6909: Another process has already added the cursor=DefaultCreated
Here is better explanation from one of our accountants: Check batch #001747 was for 1 check $5,000.00 (which printed fine as check #000357) This was a partial payment against voucher 001563. The aged AP shows the current balance for this voucher to be $3,922 (orig. $8,922 less $5,000 check). This batch is not posted to the general ledger and the check is not included on the check register. Check batch #001748 was for 1 check $3,922 (which printed fine as check #000357-same number as above) This was the final payment against voucher 001563. This check batch cannot be released and doesn’t show in the AP vendor maintenance screen or the check register. So looks like it's check number collision. We're end user and this forum was always a big help for us.
↧
Forum Post: RE: System Message 6909: Another process has already added the cursor=DefaultCreated
Based on the unique key structure for apadjust, you cannot have the same check number (adjrefnbr) entered for two different check runs. From you last post, it sounds like you created 2 different check batches using the same check number (000357) paying the same vendor and voucher. That has me confused as it sounds like you were attempting to make 2 payments against the same voucher using the same check number. That sounds illogical. You also said that check batch 001747 contains the 5000.00 check and has been released but the check does not show in the check register. It should if that batch successfully released so there is something wrong or incorrectly stated on this. Did the first check batch get posted to a different period than you ran the check register for? I would like to resolve this portion of the issue before moving on to what appears to be something illogical (using the same check number in two batches. not even sure how you were allowed to do that since the check screen would not let you enter an existing check number). Where these check batches from the manual check process or the payment selection process?
↧