Rose, is this happening on the period sensitive aged AR or the standard aged AR? In your example you seem to indicate that one document has a description and the other does not. Is that accurate? The aging reports use some rather complex views (the period sensitive aging in particular) joining tables and other views to provide the basis for what is reported. When something like this happens it is likely caused by one of the view having joined the document with 2 lines from one of the other joined tables/views. It is sometimes a challenge to find where the extra join is coming from but it can be found. My initial thought is that this particular document has collided with the same reference number from another document for the same customer or that, if you are seeing this with the period sensitive aging, there is an unexpected record in the aradjust table for this reference number. In order to run it down, we would need to know which aging report you see it one and then execute the view that report uses to look at all of the components that are joined together to make that view that has the duplicate line.
↧